WHY TRUMP IS BAD FOR AFRICA

 

United States' Vice Presidnet Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump.

By Julius Ogunro

The US presidential election is only a few days away and polls show Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump statistically tied with no clear sign of a victor. This is probably the closest US presidential election ever. Harris, the Democratic Party’s candidate, and Republican Trump are campaigning tirelessly in the battleground or swing states, where both parties have no overwhelming support and either can win, making the states highly competitive and crucial for the outcome.

Whoever wins the election has serious implications for the rest of the world, especially the continent of Africa. Because what is on the ballot is more than just two persons vying for office, but competing worldviews, ideologies and frameworks for global engagement. With the outsize influence of the United States, this is as serious as it can get, and whether you are interested or not, the November 5th US presidential election will impact you nonetheless.

If it were left to some Nigerians, Trump, the Republican nominee, would win hands down. This is surprising considering that Harris, the Democratic candidate, is African-American and the historic ties between the continent of Africa and the Democratic Party, which, when in power, tends to implement more pro-Africa policies than the Republican Party.

Why is Trump so popular among some Nigerian demographics? Three factors could be deduced for this.

1. Many Nigerians were disappointed by the alleged role played by then-President Barrack Obama of the Democratic Party in the 2015 Nigerian presidential election, which saw the defeat of incumbent Goodluck Jonathan of the PDP by APC’s Muhammadu Buhari. Although Obama didn’t come out for Jonathan or Buhari, many PDP supporters alleged his undertone was pro-Buhari, who was marketed as the anti-corruption candidate. They pointed to diplomatic pressures from the US, the threat to sanction government officials involved in electoral malpractices and some other subtle efforts to intervene in Buhari’s favour. Since then, many of these Nigerians, especially from the southeast, which used to be a PDP stronghold, have switched from supporting the Democratic Party to the Republicans, even though this has no real electoral consequences.

2. The Republican Party ostensibly represents traditional Christian values, especially regarding marriage and family. This connects with many in Nigeria, a deeply religious and homophobic country, where, according to Pew Research, over 90 per cent pray regularly. Many Nigerians therefore gravitate to the Party that shares the same conservative outlook.  Conversely, they see the Democratic Party as anti-religious and conservative norms, which push the LGBTQ agenda and upends the natural order of society.

3.  Finally, Trump is perceived as a strong man and leader, mirroring the autocratic leadership style greatly admired and popular in Africa, where military dictators, autocrats and despots who build state institutions around themselves are fairly common.

ALSO READ: RIVERS’ BROKEN PEACE: UNPACKING THE WIKE-FUBARA FEUD

But is Trump good for Africa?

Based on his records as president and antecedents, the short answer is no.  A study of the policies, programmes and actions taken by Trump, the 45th US president, shows a preponderance of decisions that could be regarded as anti-Africa. History also shows a pattern of his bias against black people. He was accused of discrimination against blacks in the US as a businessman in the 1970s, with the US Department of Justice successfully suing Trump Management, a company owned by Trump and his father for racial discrimination by systemically refusing to let apartments to blacks in New York City.  He had also been called out several times for racist comments about black people, which may suggest an approach to Africa and its diaspora influenced by this long-standing attitude of racial bias rather than genuine partnership or engagement with the continent.

Trump campaigned for president based on an ‘America-first’ principle, suggesting he would focus primarily on his country and not lend helping hands to less-endowed nations accustomed to looking up to the United States for leadership and support. As president, he implemented a rash of policies that disproportionately impacted Africa negatively.  These ranged from immigration restrictions to reductions in aid and strained diplomatic relations.

For instance, one of his first major foreign policies, executed one week after Trump came to power, was a travel ban on several Muslim-majority countries, many of which were African. It restricted entry into the United States from these predominantly Muslim countries, leading to significant controversy and legal challenges.

In 2020, the travel ban was extended to include Nigeria, Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar (Burma), Sudan, and Tanzania. The prohibition on Nigeria was particularly significant as it targeted immigrants seeking to permanently settle in the U.S. but allowed non-immigrant travel to continue. President Joe Biden, who succeeded Trump, reversed this ban on his first day in office.

The Trump administration also proposed significant cuts to foreign assistance programmes, including those targeting African countries. He also wanted a reduction in funding for USAID, which is the soft-power arm of the US and has historically provided development assistance in many African countries across several spectrums, including health, education, humanitarian support, women's empowerment, and gender equality programmes.

The policies and actions of President Trump that had serious negative consequences for African countries were too many to be captured sufficiently in one essay. Even several books may not be able to do justice to them. So, let's just list a few: Withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO; reduction of US diplomatic and economic engagement in Africa; attempt to end the temporary protected status for African immigrants in the US; and limited support for peacekeeping and conflict resolution on the continent.

In conclusion, many of Trump’s policies and actions, particularly on immigration, aid, trade, diplomacy, and security, adversely affected African countries and their people. But, perhaps, nothing reflects his attitude toward Africa and black people more than the derogatory comments he made in 2018 when he reportedly referred to African nations as ‘’shithole countries.’’ Those two words were packed with his history and attitude of racism and discontent for people of African descent and their origins.

 Yet Trump may win, with substantial support from African-American men who see him as a model of strong leadership. If that happens, Africans should brace for a continuation, if not intensification, of his policies that could further discriminate against the continent and people through harsher immigration measures, reduced aid, and a dismissive diplomatic engagement.